Nebraska Soybean Results: FX3 Delivers a $50/acre Advantage

When fertilizer is already going down, the question becomes simple: can FX3 add enough value on top of the grower’s normal program to justify the additional application?

In this Nebraska soybean comparison, the answer was yes.

FX3 was applied after the grower’s normal fertilizer regimen, meaning it was used as an addition to the existing fertility program—not as a replacement. At harvest, the field receiving FX3 averaged 92.88 bushels per acre, compared with 83.47 bushels per acre in the field without FX3.

That represents a 9.41 bu/ac increase, or approximately 11.3% higher yield.

Most importantly, after accounting for the economics of the application, the FX3-treated acres showed an approximately $50-per-acre positive delta.

More From the Same Acre

The goal of FX3 isn’t simply to put more fertilizer on the field. It is to help growers get more productivity from the fertility program they are already investing in.

In this trial: WITH FX3: 92.88 bu/ac WITHOUT FX3: 83.47 bu/acYIELD

DIFFERENCE: +9.41 bu/acYIELD INCREASE: +11.3% ECONOMIC DELTA: +$50/acre

For a grower farming 1,000 soybean acres, a $50-per-acre improvement represents $50,000 in additional value across the operation.

One field doesn’t define every growing environment, but results like these demonstrate exactly what we are looking for with FX3: measurable agronomic performance that ultimately puts more dollars back into the grower’s acre.

FX3 helps make your fertilizer work harder.